การเปรียบเทียบความแม่นยำในการจำคำศัพท์ผ่านการตัดสินการเรียนรู้

Abstract

The purpose of this research study was to compare word recall accuracy through Judgments of Leaming (JOL) under 3 conditions: 1) NO JOL, 2) Immediate JOL, and 3) Delayed JOL. Participants were 84 undergraduates from a university in Bangkok, who were randomly assigned into the three conditions. All were presented with the carefully selected 30 stimulus word pairs for one trial (8 seconds for each pairs) and were instructed to reproducer the word pairs approximately 5 minutes after that. Participants in the Immediate JOL and Delayed JOL conditions were also requested to estimate how confident they were that they would recall the word pairs during the test trial. Findings revealed that participants in the Delayed JOL and Immediate JOL conditions did not perform significantly better than those in the NO JOL condition, F(2, 81) = 1.20, p> .05. However, when an additional analysis was conducted to compare the association between the confidence estimation and the actual performance, it was found that the association was stronger in the Delayed JOL condition than in the Immediate JOL condition.