Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62172
Title: Real-World Safety of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab Treatments for Retinal Diseases in Thailand : A Prospective Observational Study
Authors: Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri
Usa Chaikledkaew
Suthasinee Kumluang
Wu, Olivia
Geue, Claudia
Tanapat Ratanapakorn
Pattara Leelahavarong
Lily Ingsrisawang
Paisan Ruamviboonsuk
Wongsiri Taweebanjongsin
Janejit Choovuthayakorn
Apichart Singalavanija
Prut Hanutsaha
Kittisak Kulvichit
Thitiporn Ratanapojnard
Warapat Wongsawad
Yot Teerawattananon
Email: No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
Kittisak.K@Chula.ac.th
No information provided
No information provided
No information provided
Other author: Chulalongkorn University. Faculty of Medicine
Issue Date: Sep-2018
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Citation: Clinical Drug Investigation. vol.38, no.9 (Sep., 2018), p.853-865
Abstract: Background : There is very limited evidence examining serious systemic adverse events (SSAEs) and post-injection endophthalmitis of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) treatments in Thailand and low- and middle-income countries. Moreover, findings from the existing trials might have limited generalizability to certain populations and rare SSAEs. Objectives : This prospective observational study aimed to assess and compare the safety profiles of IVB and IVR in patients with retinal diseases in Thailand. Methods : Between 2013 and 2015, 6354 patients eligible for IVB or IVR were recruited from eight hospitals. Main outcomes measures were prevalence and risk of SSAEs, mortality, and endophthalmitis during the 6-month follow-up period. Results : In the IVB and IVR groups, 94 and 6% of patients participated, respectively. The rates of outcomes in the IVB group were slightly greater than in the IVR group. All-cause mortality rates in the IVB and IVR groups were 1.10 and 0.53%, respectively. Prevalence rates of endophthalmitis and non-fatal strokes in the IVB group were 0.04% of 16,421 injections and 0.27% of 5975 patients, respectively, whereas none of these events were identified in the IVR group. There were no differences between the two groups in the risks of mortality, arteriothrombotic events (ATE), and non-fatal heart failure (HF). Adjustment for potential confounding factors and selection bias using multivariable models for time-to-event outcomes and propensity scores did not alter the results. Conclusions : The rates of SAEs in both groups were low. The IVB and IVR treatments were not associated with significant risks of mortality, ATE, and non-fatal HF.
URI: http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/62172
URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-018-0678-5
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40261-018-0678-5
ISSN: 1173-2563 (print)
1179-1918 (online)
metadata.dc.identifier.DOI: 10.1007/s40261-018-0678-5
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Foreign Journal Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
html_submission_64992.htmlLink to Fulltext2.82 kBHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.