Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/8190
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorผ่องพรรณ ลวนานนท์-
dc.contributor.otherจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. คณะอักษรศาสตร์-
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-30T07:19:21Z-
dc.date.available2008-09-30T07:19:21Z-
dc.date.issued2529-
dc.identifier.citationวารสารวิทยบริการ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย. 8,2(ต.ค. 2529),84-102en
dc.identifier.issn0125-2852-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/8190-
dc.description.abstractalternativeThe author attempts to raise into attention the significance of personnel appraisal within the library domain, particularly in the present condition when most of the libraries are facing with the problems of budget-cutting. A comparison between the traditional and the modernized methods of the system of performance appraisal is presented by citing the works of McGregor, Likert, and Mayfield. Patterns of performance appraisal are classified into three types of rating scale, of desired choice and with criticism, and of interview method. The three systems of interview method are also manifested. The author analyzes further which of the performance appraisals –written appraisal or oral assessment—are mostly appropriate. It concludes with the study of the interesting performance appraisals.en
dc.format.extent4938871 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isothes
dc.publisherจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัยen
dc.rightsจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัยen
dc.subjectการประเมินผลงาน-
dc.subjectห้องสมุด -- การบริหาร-
dc.titleการประเมินผลงานบุคลากรen
dc.title.alternativePersonnel appraisalen
dc.typeArticlees
dc.email.authorphong@chula.ac.th-
Appears in Collections:OAR - Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Phongpharn.pdf4.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.